"The data was edited on a virtual desktop and deleted after the escrow account fraud by Mr. Oliver Bellenhaus or related persons became known." (Emphasis added)  

It goes without saying that this constitutes a serious act of obstruction of justice. Had Bellenhaus not destroyed the transaction data, a simple data analysis could now reveal the extent to which third-party revenues existed and were embezzled. Precisely to prevent this, Bellenhaus—whom the prosecution considers "credible"—deleted the entire transaction data set, thereby depriving the proceedings of their entire data and evidentiary basis. This outrageous act—which will be discussed in more detail later—is not even mentioned in the prosecution's credibility analysis.  

Reports on the Quarterly Meetings of Third-Party Partners
The accused, Bellenhaus, prepared "Meeting Minutes" for Wirecard's third-party partners every quarter for their "Quarterly Meetings." These quarterly reports detail the financial situation of the third-party partners. These quarterly reports are noteworthy for several reasons:

Firstly, the quarterly reports explicitly state that the transaction data was transferred to the "Hadoop cluster." As explained above, this is the external data platform that Bellenhaus had commissioned from the company Syncrasy.  

For example, the minutes of the Q3 2007 quarterly meeting of Wirecard's third-party partner PayEasy (BB XXVII-1, p. 300) state:

"This quarter, too, sales were exported from PayEasy's core systems and transferred to the Hadoop cluster."  

And further (BB XXVII-1, p. 303):

“…PayEasy is very open to a renegotiation of the contract and also supports the move to the cloud… My personal impression is that Mr. Bauer would gratefully accept the opportunity for outsourcing and that Wirecard could stabilize and professionalize PayEasy's processing with such a solution.”
 

The quarterly reports provide aggregated, detailed figures on the sales volume of the respective third-party partners. These reports specifically reference the accounts of Wirecard's third-party partners at Wirecard Bank and present aggregated summaries of the bank statement data in tabular form. As just one example, the Q4 2018 quarterly report for the Wirecard third-party partner PayEasy includes account data with screenshots. For December 2018, the quarterly report contains the following information under the heading "Sales Volume Statement 64522" (BB XXX-15-3, p. 1271):  

The statement lists the low balance, high balance, average balance, value-added average balance, and accumulated credit turnover with specific figures. Upon verification of these figures, the defense determined that they are aggregated figures from the bank statements of the Wirecard third-party partner's account number 64522 at Wirecard Bank. The aggregated data corresponds to the payments received in the aforementioned account.  

It should be noted that the account of Wirecard's third-party partner PayEasy, account number 64522, is the account on which third-party partner revenues totaling €354,167,932.90 were generated between 2016 and 2020, of which €222,500,000.00 alone was embezzled to the embezzlement company Pittodrie. The quarterly reports contain no further information on the depositors or the target companies of the capital outflows. The quarterly reports also refer to other accounts of Wirecard's third-party partners, such as accounts numbered 64244 (Centurion) and 66420 (Centurion). The business performance is presented authentically in the quarterly reports based on the  

The aggregated account data is presented and explained in detail and in a comprehensible manner. For example, the minutes for the third quarter of 2017 provide the following explanation regarding the account data (BB XXVII-2, p. 302):

"Transactions on the PayEasy Group's accounts continue to develop favorably. While these are declining on the main account, foreign currency accounts are being used more actively. To date, the AML department has not received a single inquiry regarding the transaction business, nor have any correspondent banks raised any questions. The penalty fees of €4.5 million retained in the previous quarter had to be paid in full to the partner bank and card organizations. No further damages have been incurred."
 

The records also include breakdowns of the transaction volumes of the respective third-party partners for each month. This shows that the transactions on the accounts of Wirecard's third-party partners are not volumes, but rather commission payments, which represent only a small fraction of the total volume. For example, for the month of December 2018 (BB XXX-15-3, p. 1269):  

The right-hand column contains detailed risk exposure calculations that could only have been derived from analyses in Syncrasy's Hadoop database (see also BB XXVII-1, pp. 70, 83, 90). These appear to be screenshots of tables from Syncrasy's Hadoop database (see also BB XXVII-2, p. 451; BB XXVII-2, pp. 453 to 455). The tables contain authentic data; they include detailed merchant IDs, volume information, authorized transactions, chargebacks, etc. According to the records, from Q4 2016 onward, a "list of merchants on record with all customers processed by Payeasy" was also provided, which likewise includes the corresponding merchant IDs and portfolio markers. Quarterly reports with screenshots from the Hadoop database also exist for the other Wirecard third-party partners (see, for example, BB XXVII-1, p. 251; BB XXVII-2, p. 290 ff.).  

The reports are particularly authentic because – contrary to Bellenhaus's claim – they do not document a steady increase in transaction volume, but rather regularly report declines and fluctuating developments. Furthermore, the reports show that forecasts were frequently not met, which – if one accepts Bellenhaus's claim of a "delta" in the  

Na, Du Schlingel :)
Anfang 2017 wollte ich unbedingt meinen Dickschädel durchsetzen und bin in meinen Shorts geblieben, bis sie geplatzt sind und habe noch welche nachgekauft :)
Aber man konnte sich ernsthaft mit Dir streiten, das war ungewöhnlich
LG
PP33493815  

 

Du zitierst aus  (EA II-3-X S. 83) etc   ....priceless!

sind das die Haftprüfungsanträge von Dierlamm u Kraßlach???  

These messages are the result of five years of work by me and all those who make up my team of experts who collaborated with me to defend the dignity and work of Dr. Markus Braun. The study and research took place in two locations:
1) Singapore
2) Munich.
Based on our findings, we expect a harsh criminal conviction for Thilagaratnam's brother, R. Shanmugaratnam, director of Strategic. Shanmugaratnam, director of Citadelle Corporate Services Pte Ltd, and for James Henry O'Sullivan ("O'Sullivan"). Since it has been established, O'Sullivan is the beneficial owner of Strategic.
For confirmation, we calmly await the decision of the Singapore judges, scheduled for January 6, 2026.
Regarding the ongoing trial in Munich, we expect a full declaration of non-involvement in the criminal acts attributed to Dr. Markus Braun. We also calmly await the verdict and sentence of the Munich judges. If the results are different, we will get to work immediately.  

Mein englisch als Landei unterirdisch. Verschwörungsblasen um die deutsche Rakete ja ganz hübsch, aber das jetz bisschen übertrieben.  

Just one question:
How many sessions of the Wirecard trial currently underway in Munich have you attended?
I think none at all.
These messages are the pure and simple words that Professor Alfred Dierlamm presented to Judge Markus Fodisch in defense of the dignity and work of Dr. Markus Braun.  

One more thing:
Instead of writing silly messages, why don't you try to seriously inform yourself about the progress of the Wirecard trial, like we did? There are young people studying law at the trial sessions, and they take notes on what's being discussed. Try asking some of them. If you're lucky and pay them a fair fee, you'll be able to find out what you're interested in. There's a trial session on December 18th. Go to Munich. Ask the young people you meet if what I say is nonsense, or if it's true.  

It's incredible, I posted Professor Alfred Dierlamm's entire defense. No German knew anything about it. Where are the German journalists? Aren't they following the trial in Munich?  

No one has published anything about Professor Alfred Dierlamm's defense work. But Judge Markus Fodsch's superiors, the German Supreme Court of Justice, have read Professor Alfred Dierlamm's defense work?  

My English, being a provincial, is terrible. The conspiracy theories about the German missile are all well and good, but this one is a bit exaggerated.
This was the response to my post, which faithfully repeated Professor Alfred Dierlamm's words at the Wirecard Trial. A German insulting Germany's best lawyer. I'd never seen that before.  

Er zitiert offensichtlich aus einem Dokument, das etwas umfangreicher ist und im Jahr 2022 geschrieben zu sein scheint (" zwei Jahre nach Beginn der Ermittlungen").
Nach ein bisschen Recherche gehe ich davon aus, dass es sich um eine private Zusammenfassung des Nichteröffnungsantrags handelt, das wird im handelsblatt 2022 erwähnt und passt von der Zeit her ins zwischenverfahren.

Wirecard-Strafverteidiger Dierlamm: „Nur der Erfolg des Mandanten zählt“ https://share.google/UERdnu5oV64eopFQR

Das kann aber eigentlich nicht sein, denn wenn Rene Bender auch nur ansatzweise informiert gewesen wäre, wie unfassbar detailliert die Verteidigung argumentiert hat, wäre es nur mit größter Mühe möglich, zu erklären, was ihn dann zu einer Reihe unterirdischer Artikel über das Verfahren bewegt haben könnte...

wenn du eine konkrete Frage hast: nur zu.
ich finde den Text außerordentlich spannend und laut der KI ist damit meine Argumentation endgültig nicht mehr widerlegbar.

aus rein formalen und logischen Gründen

damit wird es jetzt langsam eng für die Journalisten, ihre geistige Blockade weiterhin so aufreizend zur Schau zu stellen

denn weder eine bewusste Entscheidung zum weiteren schweigen noch ein schweigen aus einem derartigen Mangel an Verständnis passt zum selbstverständnis investigativer Journalisten.

außer man hat keines

https://fontaane.wordpress.com/2025/12/15/der-wirecard-komplex/



33496553  

Ich denke auch dass Rechtsanwälte und STeuerberater in der Pflicht sind ihre Betätigungsfelder von Grund auf zu DIGITALISIEREN und Reformieren.

Überwachung muss AuToMatisiERT u Kostenfrei werden. Es kann nicht sein dass es Kameraauswertungen teils nicht herangezogen werden dürfen.
In Asien sind die meisten  Verbrechen sofort beweisbar und werden somit protektiv verhindert

#meimerlösung

https://x.com/csFraudAnalysis/status/2001213483472343151